On 8/31/2021 4:44 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 1:51:01 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
On 8/30/2021 12:52 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 8:51:32 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
In other words eternally at a particular time. Is there any
reason I should take that seriously?
And how would you like to take it? According to theory of
relativity time is a kind of space.
So my house here is exists everywhere?
No, by "eternally" I didn't mean everywhere in the time dimension but
without passage of time. There is no passage of time just as there is
no passage of space.
So eternally means momentarily. Hmmm?
Are they. Here's two photons. If I interchange them I have the
same state. Here's two golf balls. If I interchange them I have
different state. Here's a member of the tennis team and a member
of the band. I can't interchange them...because they are the same
person. It's seems to me that my conceptualization makes a lot of
difference in how things map onto the natural numbers.
Just because two objects are the same doesn't mean they are one
object. They are differentiated from each other by their position in
reality (by their relations to other objects).
Even one object is a conceputalization. Thomas Pales now is a different
object from Thomas Pales a moment ago. And as a physicists I may regard
him as 1e30 different atoms.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9e7e5fec-92cf-5434-9c20-d6e824d339cd%40verizon.net.
