On 4/29/2022 10:55 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 5:21:50 PM UTC-6 Bruce wrote:

    On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 9:00 AM John Clark <johnk...@gmail.com> wrote:

        On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 6:30 PM Alan Grayson
        <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:

            /> If m in f = ma, decreases by 50% on every single split,
            I'm pretty sure (but not certain) that planetary orbits
            would change, making life impossible on Earth. g might not
            change, but G likely will./


    If by G you mean Newton's universal gravitational constant, then
    that will not change if all energies are reduced by 50% because it
    is not an energy. Despite the claims made by some here, the
    gravitational acceleration at the surface of the earth, g, will
    certainly change. From the text-books, g = GM/r^2, where G is
    Newton's constant, M is the mass of the earth, and r its radius.
    If you reduce M by 50%, then g will also reduce by 50%.


What is the relationship between g and the orbital elements of the Earth, or any body entering the solar system and being captured? I once had a course in Orbital Mechanics a LONG TIME AGO, and in trying to reconstruct what I learned, I think most, possibly all of the orbital elements, are purely *accidental*, say for a body entering the solar system and being captured; namely, the eccentricity, the ap and perihelions, the location of the foci (for a closed orbit) and their separation distance, the inclination of the orbit referencing the plane defined by the rotation of the Sun, and so forth. All the elements are purely accidental in defining the orbit except possibly its mass, and depend on the parameter of the incoming vector. But how does the gravitational acceleration at the surface of such a body fit into this picture, if indeed it does? AG

A body entering the solar system has enough energy to leave the solar system, unless it collides with something.  So it's orbit will be an hyperbola.  It won't be captured.

Brent


        As I've a explained before and will not explain again, If the
        sun's gravitational attraction to the earth, f, is reduced by
        50% (because the sun's mass/energy is reduced by 50%) then the
        earth's inertia must also be reduced by 50% (because the
        earth's mass/energy is also reduced by 50%) so the two changes
        would cancel out and the earth's orbit would not change by one
        nanometer. And for the same reason if you performed an
        experiment, after the two changes were made to determine the
        value of G, the experiment would look exactly as it did before
        and so you'd get the same numerical value for G.


    As I said, Newton's constant. G, is not an energy so it will not
    change. But gravitational forces depend on the product of the
    masses involved, not their ratio. So changing the energy will
    certainly change planetary orbits and most other things
    gravitational. The argument about inertia is spurious because that
    will affect only one of the masses, say the mass of the moon, m,
    in the gravitational attraction between earth and moon. Newton's
    gravitational law says that the force between the earth and the
    moon is GMm/r^2, where r is the earth-moon distance, and the other
    factors are as before. The inertia of the moon will change with m,
    but the inertia of the earth  will not change with its mass M
    (because in this simple approximation, the earth is not moving).
    The moon's mass, m, then cancels out, and the orbital attraction
    changes according to the change in the Earth's mass, M. So the
    orbit will necessarily change if the mass M is reduced by 50%. So
    just as the acceleration at the surface of the earth, g, decreases
    by the same factor as the energy, the attraction between the earth
    and the moon decreases by the same factor. You could certainly
    measure the change in g directly by experiments on the surface of
    the earth. Or you could watch the earth-moon distance increasing.
    In either case, the changes induced by reducing all energies by
    50% will be very evident.

    Bruce

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9b1f8f9b-3379-4c3e-9614-26f957331977n%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9b1f8f9b-3379-4c3e-9614-26f957331977n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/36cfca64-fc94-7673-711e-759e97dca08a%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to