On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 11:32 AM smitra <smi...@zonnet.nl> wrote:

> On 05-05-2022 01:15, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 5:27 AM smitra <smi...@zonnet.nl> wrote:
> >
> >> On 04-05-2022 01:49, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I have not introduced any concept of probability. The 2^N branches
> >>> that are constructed when both outcomes are realized on each of N
> >>> Bernoulli trials are all on the same basis.
> >>
> >> If you ignore the amplitudes in the states, and that means modifying
> >> QM into something else.
> >
> > QM does not assume that all branches exist equally. In Everett you
> > have already modified QM into something else.
> >
> > The Schrodinger equation is insensitive to the amplitudes. You get the
> > same set of 2^N branches from the Schrodinger equation, whatever
> > amplitudes you have. The weights of these branches certainly depend on
> > the amplitudes: if there are n zeros in the set of N trials, there are
> > N-n ones. The weight of the corresponding binary string is a^n
> > b^(N-n), but without further assumption, this plays no role in the
> > future development of the state or in the interpretation of the binary
> > string. If you interpret it as the probability of the string, you
> > again have a conflict, since all binary strings are constructed on an
> > equal basis, the natural probability for each is 2^{-N}.
>
> There is no conflict whatsoever with assuming the Born rule and the
> Schrodinger equation. The "construction on an equal basis" is not at all
> implied by the Schrödinger equation.
>

It is when you take the SE to imply that all possible outcomes exist on
each trial. That gives all outcomes equal status.

Bruce

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSMV1OBH4Zm4jO1-rY82prqxANc4ZZcOHppOgJ1p6Z5zQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to