So you are going to quibble with things that "I" said? You people are so whacked out that it is utterly incomprehensible. So where were you when I was called a "liar" or a "wife beater" or "stupid" or "idiot" or that I "starve children". All of that is OK in your whacky bizarro world, but explaining to someone that if you start a fight (in email for Christ's sake) that I will finish that fight. Oh that is TERRIBLE! How could you SAY such a thing. Never mind the "liar", "stupid", "idiot" stuff, THAT, sir, is uncalled for.
Bob, you amaze me. > You know, I'm just as happy to NOT read this dribble, but when someone > points out so wonderfully how ethical they are, and we can all go to > www.infonition.com/ethics.shtml to prove it, then someone like me just > might go there and read, and low and behold what is it we find? > > Well, this character Greg, wants us all to believe his "ethics" are > without question. So, let's take a look at his ethics page and see what > he's supposed to be doing. > > First, Greg's point of vendor conflict is answered here: > > To never accept compensation from vendors for recommending products=20 > > One must ask then Greg, have you ever been to a seminar, conference, or > LUNCH where the vendor presenting paid for the meal, the snacks, the > coffee? > > Second, Greg's list of ethics claim: > > To disclose any and all influences that may affect our recommendations=20 > > Greg, does this mean that if I were to speak to you over the phone, you > would tell me just how many times your Cisco, Microsoft, Bay Networks, > etc., Rep. has called? Or are you saying that you never meet with the > vendors to discuss how their products can benefit your customers? Do > you ever read trade magazines that discuss the use of one vendors > products over another? Will you then tell me all the magazines you > read, what date, publication, page number, etc? > > Third, Greg's list goes on to say: > > To be fair and accurate when resolving disputes, problems or issues > [and] To conduct ourselves in a professional manner at all times=20 > > One must ask then Greg, exactly how does your statement of: "Wrong. You > brought it up by throwing stones my way. I don't pick fights, I finish > them." work into these statements? > > This is just what I don't need in a vendor. Someone who believes he's > always right, and if he is going to have a fight with his customers, > HE'S going to finish it. I can see now why people flock to your > organization Greg. > > The point is, don't say something matters a great deal to you, and then > give this list plenty of examples showing that apparently it doesn't. > You want to wave a flag around and say "I have ethics" and yet not live > by those same ethics, then be prepared to be inundated with the > onslaught. > > I would trust Ed, Tom, Tony, and even Don, further then I would trust > someone yelling about how ethical they are and at the same time say > they'll finish any fight. > > It's time to throttle back now greg, and realize this. You are a Sales > Manager for a company that apparently you are supposed to be drumming up > business for. Just how much business do you think you have generated on > this list after acting in the manner you did? > > Bob Sadler > > -----Original Message----- _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
