On Friday 18 May 2001 08:56, Al Baker wrote: > Just to clarify, the kapm-idled problem is just for > kernel2.4.3? I hate seeing gkrellm going nuts on CPU > while I'm just sitting there in a VI terminal. > kapm-idled is a method of counting idle cycles developed with kernel 2.4 The instruments that measure such, gkrellm and top and such, need to be rewritten to put the output of kapm-idled in the right place. Civileme
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Sebastian Hassinger
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Praedor Tempus
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Stephen Boulet
- RE: [expert] Stability Concerns David Joham
- RE: [expert] Stability Concerns ergeorge
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns ergeorge
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Craig Sprout
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns J. Solomon Kostelnik
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Orlin Damyanov
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Al Baker
- RE: [expert] Stability Concerns Civileme
- RE: [expert] Stability Concerns David Joham
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns ergeorge
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Todd Flinders
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns ergeorge
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Sebastian Hassinger
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns ergeorge
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Marcel Pol
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Civileme
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Tom Brinkman
- Re: [expert] Stability Concerns Eric George
