Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ' 40,000 Iranian Suicide bombers/ Sunday Times'

[MDixon6569]

In a message dated 4/17/06 9:41:27 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, it is easier to just bomb the kids and kill 'em like we do. Collateral damage, right? Several thousand feet up, denial is easy. So messy, up close and 'horrific'. Give us a break- you are suffering from John Wayne-itis. No, that was Clinton's tactic in Serbia. Bomb from  thirty thousand  feet up and hope you hit a military target. Unfortunately most targets were either cardboard tanks or civilians. As for the United States military I don't believe any ever intentionally target civilians, children. I personally believe they put themselves at much greater risk to avoid hitting civilians but when their enemy hides among civilians dressed in civilian clothes accidents happen. Maybe you can name a major military action in which civilians were not killed. Or maybe you should compare how many have been killed in Europe and Asia in WW2. Any civilian death in Iraq or Afghanistan is a far cry from Iran lining thousands of children up to walk across a mine field in front of their soldiers. If you can't see the difference, I'm sorry. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.