--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 4/17/06 9:38:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > How is a nuclear strike on Iran going to prevent them > from getting, or convince them not to get, a smuggled > nuke? > > > > It may not need to be a nuclear strike. But I would imagine it would work > much like the Israeli strike against the nuclear facility in Iraq. Shut the > place down. the only reason anybody has ever mentioned using nukes is that it > might be necessary to use a more powerful bunker buster to insure the bunkers > are destroyed. Iran has bragged about their super deep bunkers that they > believe can withstand a conventional attack. Fortunately, the Iranian leaders > chose to build their nuclear facilities away from heavily populated areas, > almost as if they might anticipate the possibility of a strike. As for acquiring > one from another source? Funny thing is, nuclear detonations leave a "finger > print" so to speak. They can be traced back to the reactor the material came > from. Anybody passing off a bomb to Iran to use else where would be known > immediately.
Let me ask it another way: How is a nuclear strike on Iran going to prevent them from getting, or convince them not to get, a smuggled nuke? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
