On 20 Jul 2007 at 10:55, João Miguel Pais wrote: > About Mr. Fenton's remarks I find them quite biased, with no other > concern than to protect his "sacred cow". By saying "He didn't even > enter the music for the bottom half of the page." you're speaking > about the user, not about the program.
No, I was addressing the fact that Dennis said he took 4 hours to do his version and the report that the Sibelius user took 2 hours. Given that the top music had no spacing applied to it and the bottom half wasn't entered (let alone spaced properly), it seemed to me that the 2 hours was pretty meaningless. [] > (there are several details where finale is much better as sibelius, > but please next time do try to get them, it would be more productive > than a "buaa, the sibelius guy was so dumb he didn't noticed the > there were notes missing") I compared the two and the look of the one was vastly superior to the other, not because I'm familiar with it, but because it looked more like the engraved music I'm accustomed to seeing. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
