On 12/12/2008 09:36 AM, Durk Talsma asked for bug reports. So on 12/15/2008 11:20 PM, I sent in some bug reports. Please don't shoot the messenger.
On 12/16/2008 06:38 AM, Heiko Schulz wrote in part: > Oh- did I mention that the aircraft is still WIP? Did I? No? Actually on 12/02/2008 05:14 AM, Heiko Schulz wrote in part: > I always heard that the c172p is one of our > most realistic ones.... And on 12/07/2008 11:00 AM, Heiko Schulz wrote in part: > We have reports from real c172 pilots that thy don't see any issues! 1) As for me, I always assume all this stuff is a WIP, even when people claim otherwise. 2) You can't make bugs go away by shouting "there are no bugs!" 3) There are some people on this list who are quick to turn anything and everything into a personal attack, but it doesn't need to be that way. There are plenty of other lists in the world where that doesn't happen. > I used the instrumentes given by FlightGear- instead using someones > other instrument we should correct the existing ones. So when will > you do this? I submitted patches to correct many of the "old bugs" recently mentioned. Dozens of them. I submitted them a couple of years ago. Nobody even looked at them. If nobody wants to fix these bugs, that's OK ... but it would be way, way off base to accuse me of not offering constructive contributions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
