* John Denker -- Tuesday 16 December 2008: > I submitted patches to correct many of the "old bugs" > recently mentioned. Dozens of them. I submitted them > a couple of years ago. Nobody even looked at them.
I'm pretty sure that I looked at every single of them. But either I wasn't competent to judge them and hoped someone else would review/discuss/commit (atmosphere stuff, instruments), or I was (sufficiently) competent, but my complaints were not addressed (multiline gdb-backtraces added to function headers etc.) and you didn't re-submit fixed versions[1]. And then there were a few of your patches that I actually committed. Two or three, IIRC. And, finally, I even looked at the bug list on your website and picked up two ideas from there and implemented them. > it would be way, way off base to accuse me of not > offering constructive contributions. That's true. m. [1] Of course, this doesn't mean that only code can go in that *I* find acceptable. But OTOH, nobody can expect me to commit something that I don't like. :-} ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel