Heiko Schulz wrote: > Hi, > > Well, This time I really think I should make my works commercial- or > if you want to have all this give ma a lot of money. > > I'm aware that we want to make it right, like our overall concept on > flightgear.org says. But this is also dependant of time and (!) > information the model authos have. All what I did was updating the > 3d-modell to the state of the art now we can have with FGFS.
Hi Heiko, you did a wonderful job! I'm sure most of us think the same. When furbishing the Tomcat I have only one tester, Jano, and he gives me useful feedback. (Yes Melchior also helps a lot with nasal reviewing). With only a friend having a look at my job, there will never be a so much in depth review. And yes some time I also feel tired fixing bugs and unaccuracy again and again. I think you shouldn't take this over detailed review as personal criticism about your work. Writing such a review is already a hell of a job, and it difficultly could take all historical aspects in account. We are all stressed while building for ourself an idea of what should be the next release. Anyhow, it is a good thing that you did precise what is the scope or area of you work. Sure, the c172p will be near perfect soon or later. All the best, Alexis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel