On Thursday 28 December 2006 13:47, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 10:47:28 -0500, Josh wrote in message > > > As it stands though, Arnt didn't bother to find out who actually was > > the author of the plane (easy to do) and went off on a completely > > irrelevant and in my eyes offensive rant. > > ..I agree it should be irrelevant. The worst part is, knowing the truth > is still not enough, as I said earlier, facts are not needed, _any_ shit > story can be built from a few quotes from anyone of us, that and a > little bit of money will do, to start and then settle a lawsuit to drain > money off us. Any good lawyer can tell you that, only he's gonna be > far more expensive than me. >
http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2004030120301285 I believe you'd find point 14 of particular interest. FWIW, this is my last posting in this thread. ;-) D. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
