-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#review2419
-----------------------------------------------------------


Just a quick pass since I didn't want to dig too much into the actual logic of 
the change.


src/cpu/inorder/cpu.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2812>

    This should be included where it's needed, not here. I'm assuming it isn't 
needed here because it wasn't here before and this code compiled.



src/cpu/inorder/cpu.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2811>

    This file isn't actually different. Please remove it from the change.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2813>

    Unnecessary white space change.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2817>

    Why is this part of the comment indented more than the earlier parts?



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2814>

    Don't add a bunch of commented out code.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2816>

    There probably should be, but Korey is the expert and would know for sure.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2815>

    I'm pretty sure it's not.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2818>

    Which hack is that?



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2819>

    Wrong indentation.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2820>

    Wrong indentation.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2821>

    Bracket goes on previous line



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2822>

    Bracket on previous line.
    
    Fix below as well.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2823>

    Fixing these random bits of trailing whitespace is good, but it should be 
its own change since it doesn't have anything to do with what this change is 
doing.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2824>

    If CacheUnitEvent isn't used and shouldn't be called, get rid of it. 
Ideally in a separate change preceding this one.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/graduation_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2825>

    Bad indentation.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/graduation_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2826>

    Bad indentation.



src/cpu/inorder/resources/inorder_translation.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2827>

    Don't comment out code, delete it.



src/cpu/translation.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/#comment2810>

    The indentation here is wrong, unless review board is confused somehow. 
Please fix up style problems.


- Gabe Black


On April 1, 2012, 5:55 p.m., Korey Sewell wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 1, 2012, 5:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> inorder: add timing translation
> This is Erik Tomusk's patch to add timing translation to InOrder. It's the 
> next step
> in getting InOrder to work for ARM.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/inorder/resources/graduation_unit.cc 6df06e5975c6 
>   src/cpu/inorder/resources/inorder_translation.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/cpu/translation.hh 6df06e5975c6 
>   src/cpu/inorder/cpu.hh 6df06e5975c6 
>   src/cpu/inorder/cpu.cc 6df06e5975c6 
>   src/cpu/inorder/inorder_dyn_inst.hh 6df06e5975c6 
>   src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.hh 6df06e5975c6 
>   src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc 6df06e5975c6 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1089/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> This is not fully tested yet but a work in progress.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Korey Sewell
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to