--=-rsVXwqQcTPOPAgX3SYaF Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The problem im having is actually at the dsl modem. It's nat doesnt seem to be working. --mat On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:19, Brad N Bendily wrote: > I've used smoothwall with my cox connection. The problem with smoothwall > is it's using ipchains instead of iptables. And the way the firewall is > loaded is strange, but if you know enough to write your own rules then > you should be able to change ipchains any way you want. >=20 > just a thought. >=20 >=20 > On 8 Jan 2003, Mat Branyon wrote: >=20 > > I have smoothwall connected to the dsl modem they sent. I am having my > > own problems with it though. As far as getting internet connection, it > > works great. The problem im getting is trying to get its nat function > > to work, its a bitch. Its a Westell 2100 series DSL Modem with either > > ethernet or usb interface. > >=20 > > --mat || It seems like the less a statesman amounts to, the more he > > loves the flag. --=-rsVXwqQcTPOPAgX3SYaF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+HH0Kspqwy6JoKBgRAgYtAJ4pAXDj9P+cWTiAgOGJdE7aUcXU0QCgwH2Q ahefDIkvYuOEfnyvmPnL9Yk= =/vU2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-rsVXwqQcTPOPAgX3SYaF--
