--=-mJOrH11u3LJbTWloWLLG
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I take that back, I was wrong, it is smoothwall.

On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:33, Mat Branyon wrote:
> The problem im having is actually at the dsl modem.  It's nat doesnt
> seem to be working.
>=20
> --mat
>=20
> On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:19, Brad N Bendily wrote:
> > I've used smoothwall with my cox connection. The problem with smoothwal=
l
> > is it's using ipchains instead of iptables. And the way the firewall is
> > loaded is strange, but if you know enough to write your own rules then
> > you should be able to change ipchains any way you want.
> >=20
> > just a thought.
> >=20
> >=20
> > On 8 Jan 2003, Mat Branyon wrote:
> >=20
> > > I have smoothwall connected to the dsl modem they sent.  I am having =
my
> > > own problems with it though.  As far as getting internet connection, =
it
> > > works great.  The problem im getting is trying to get its nat functio=
n
> > > to work, its a bitch.  Its a Westell 2100 series DSL Modem with eithe=
r
> > > ethernet or usb interface.
> > >=20
> > > --mat || It seems like the less a statesman amounts to, the more he
> > > loves the flag.

--=-mJOrH11u3LJbTWloWLLG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQA+HIP4spqwy6JoKBgRAp/pAJ9adfR4+cazQvEHJq/Nfo/3Z+BkEACeImti
WN57CxPgE+hobB4j48fDUMA=
=oipt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-mJOrH11u3LJbTWloWLLG--


Reply via email to