On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 22:31 -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Yes. A lot of things predate the incubator. I'm not opposed to say an > HTTPD-sandbox for experimental HTTPD related stuff. > I'm not opposed to a POI-sandbox (indeed we have one but call it > scratchpad) for POI-related stuff. However Jakarta-sandbox is > SCOPELESS. Go have a scopeless sandbox on sourceforge IMO. If you want > to start a whole NEW project then do that in the incubator IMO.
the sandbox already exists. the management and supervision were entrusted to the commons sub-project. sub-projects have no formal existence. the scope of the sandbox is the same as the scope for jakarta. anything that is in scope for jakarta is in scope for sub-projects. code in other languages is pretty much out but nearly any subject is in scope. the only limits are imposed by the community itself. jakarta's scope is the problem but it's hard to fix for both historic and community reasons - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
