On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 22:31 -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Yes.  A lot of things predate the incubator.  I'm not opposed to say an 
> HTTPD-sandbox for experimental HTTPD related stuff.
> I'm not opposed to a POI-sandbox (indeed we have one but call it 
> scratchpad) for POI-related stuff.  However Jakarta-sandbox is 
> SCOPELESS.  Go have a scopeless sandbox on sourceforge IMO.  If you want 
> to start a whole NEW project then do that in the incubator IMO.

the sandbox already exists. the management and supervision were
entrusted to the commons sub-project. sub-projects have no formal
existence. the scope of the sandbox is the same as the scope for

anything that is in scope for jakarta is in scope for sub-projects. code
in other languages is pretty much out but nearly any subject is in
scope. the only limits are imposed by the community itself. 

jakarta's scope is the problem but it's hard to fix for both historic
and community reasons

- robert 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to