Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:45:32 -0500
> Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What are others feelings on this?  What issues do you see with having
> > a wiki?  Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us
> > having a wiki?
> What will policy on articles that are horribly dangerous or outright
> wrong? Is Gentoo prepared to block or warn about articles that recommend
> stupid things? If a warning is used, what will be used to distinguish
> between a generic "wiki, not necessarily checked by sane people" and a
> "article known to be horrible"?

Wikipedia started using an extension for marking pages as "validated".
See [1]. This would allow us to setup a group of "trusted
people" (developers, long-time users, well-known contributors - for
example) who would be able to review pages and tag them that way.
Non-reviewed pages could show a header then clearly stating that this
specific page hasn't been reviewed and might contain inaccurate



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply via email to