Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:45:32 -0500 > Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What are others feelings on this? What issues do you see with having > > a wiki? Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us > > having a wiki? > > What will policy on articles that are horribly dangerous or outright > wrong? Is Gentoo prepared to block or warn about articles that recommend > stupid things? If a warning is used, what will be used to distinguish > between a generic "wiki, not necessarily checked by sane people" and a > "article known to be horrible"?
Wikipedia started using an extension for marking pages as "validated". See [1]. This would allow us to setup a group of "trusted people" (developers, long-time users, well-known contributors - for example) who would be able to review pages and tag them that way. Non-reviewed pages could show a header then clearly stating that this specific page hasn't been reviewed and might contain inaccurate information. Tobias [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FlaggedRevs
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
