On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Alexia Death <alexiade...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 19:42:28 sigetch wrote:
> I tried merging the smooth on top of the master yesterday. It works nicely,

I'm very happy to hear that.

> has a little bit of room for improvement(like makining the line catch up when
> you stop or finish the stroke)

I agree that improve of the stroke finishing process is very important.

> the circular queue thingy and the fact that it's a miniobject stuck into paint
> options object and its existence in general.
> The way it would need to be
> rewritten is adding a stroke array and its management functions into the paint
> core and then smoth from that. The smooth function also belongs in the paint
> core.

I simply imitate the gimp_paint_options_get_gradient_color(...), but paint core
is better choice to implement that function.

> And why does ink have its own circular buffer? whats wrong with using the
> paintcores one?
Well, simply by the historical reason. I implemented the smoothing of
the ink tool first,
and then extend it to the brush core, while keeping the first one unchanged...

> And to discuss all of this, Id like to see you in IRC :)
I'd like to do so, but unfortunately, I have very little spare time in
this month, neither
in the next month... X(
Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to