On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Tim Mooney wrote:

> In regard to: Re: TODO for 1.2 release, Garry R. Osgood said (at 5:38am on...:
> >Nick Lamb wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Enough hilarity. If you know of something which must be done before
> >> 1.2.0 please follow on to this mail. If you know of a reason why
> >> we should unfreeze Gimp instead, feel free to let loose.
> >>
> >> 1. VAGUE: Documentation should be "good" (definition anyone?)
> >> 2. Critical/ Severe bug reports should be fixed or marked down (bug #s?)
> >> 3. VAGUE: Gimp should build out-of-box on lots of systems
> >> 99. Find and #ifdef any debug scribble to console
> >> 100. Check package files, READMEs, etc. for correctness
> >>
> >
> >??. sigaction/OSF/1/GTK resolution
> >Signal messiness. and a temporary hack is (Am I correct on this, Tim Mooney?)
> I was going to send something to the list about this very issue.  You are
> correct.  The resolution was to get plumbing in glib so that it detects
> EINTR and returns some distinguishable error in that case for g_io_channels().
> That plumbing hasn't shown up yet.
> I'll send along what I've composed so far...

i think austin even had a patch for this, i'd love to include
it into glib and release 1.2.9 for gimpers. though, what exact
date do you have in mind for 1.2.0?
i don't have austin's email handy, so i'd apprechiate if anyone
would forward this email.

> Tim


Reply via email to