> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:19:29 +0200
> From: si...@budig.de
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Save, Save As and Export separated?
> Richard Gitschlag (strata_ran...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> > > there is something we can do to help the non-pro - and it does not
> > > interfere with the "professionals" workflow it probably will be
> > > considered and added.
> > ...like taking the existing warning and giving it an "Export/Cancel"
> > choice instead of simply "OK" ? That's the easiest compromise that's
> > been suggested, and it's been dogmatically shot down as "not doing
> > that, sorry". That is the part I just don't understand / agree with.
> There are a few problems I can see with this.
> As you probably know, people (professionals and non-pros) don't read
> dialogs. There is powerful pattern matching going on there and people
> just hit a button without realizing what they just did.
> Adding this shortcut would train users to use a workflow with an
> artificial stumbling block inbetween....
Okay, then what purpose does the "Save a copy" command do these days when from
the user's perspective the ONLY difference between it and "Export" is the
target file format? I suggested it once that the former should now be treated
as a variation of Export.
I don't think many people ever learned 'when' and 'why' to use that command
when there's a normal Save command available, contributing to the problem of
losing work when you saved a non-XCF version, then quit GIMP without/before
saving changes back to your XCF workfile.
Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
gimp-user-list mailing list