Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:18:31 +0100
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Suggestions for the GIMP
On Sunday, 10. February 2013 18:06:25 maderios wrote:
> Much noise about common functions.......
> Why complicate things ? This is a false problem. Any editor
> (gimp,libreoffice, krita, etc..) user must (learn to) save his work and
> should not rely on automation that slows work.
> Gimp should follow the standards available in all editors. It does not,
> it is very annoying.
What is the standard then, please? LibreOffice Writer or Scribus for example
allow users to export files as PDF, but saving should be done in a format that
allows to restore the current document as well as possible.
Mein öffentlicher Schlüssel / My public key: 4096R/600ACB3B 2012-04-01
Fingerabdruck / Fingerprint:
9902 575B B9A0 C339 CFDF 250B 9267 CA6B 600A CB3B
Runterladen z.B. bei/ Get it e.g. from:
pgp.mit.edu, subkeys.pgp.net, pgp.uni-mainz.de, pool.sks-keyservers.net, ...
Thing is -- there is no "the" standard. There are multiple standards on this
matter, and GIMP 2.8 is merely switching from one to another.
Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
gimp-user-list mailing list