From: daniel.horn...@gmx.de To: firstname.lastname@example.org Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:18:31 +0100 Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Suggestions for the GIMP On Sunday, 10. February 2013 18:06:25 maderios wrote: > Much noise about common functions....... > Why complicate things ? This is a false problem. Any editor > (gimp,libreoffice, krita, etc..) user must (learn to) save his work and > should not rely on automation that slows work. > Gimp should follow the standards available in all editors. It does not, > it is very annoying. What is the standard then, please? LibreOffice Writer or Scribus for example allow users to export files as PDF, but saving should be done in a format that allows to restore the current document as well as possible. Greetings, Daniel -- Mein öffentlicher Schlüssel / My public key: 4096R/600ACB3B 2012-04-01 Fingerabdruck / Fingerprint: 9902 575B B9A0 C339 CFDF 250B 9267 CA6B 600A CB3B Runterladen z.B. bei/ Get it e.g. from: pgp.mit.edu, subkeys.pgp.net, pgp.uni-mainz.de, pool.sks-keyservers.net, ... Thing is -- there is no "the" standard. There are multiple standards on this matter, and GIMP 2.8 is merely switching from one to another. -- Stratadrake strata_ran...@hotmail.com -------------------- Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
_______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list email@example.com https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list