github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Remove redundant `plan` from extension's check_invariants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove redundant `plan` from extension's check_invariants [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Avoid schema deep clone in PruningExpressionBuilder [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Avoid schema deep clone in PruningExpressionBuilder [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Avoid schema deep clone in PruningExpressionBuilder [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Avoid schema deep clone in PruningExpressionBuilder [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Avoid schema deep clone in PruningExpressionBuilder [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] feat: Support nested Array literals [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] disable HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] disable HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HashJoinExec sideways information passing for partitioned queries [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Dynamic Filter Pushdown is being applied to the wrong table [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dynamic Filter Pushdown is being applied to the wrong table [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dynamic Filter Pushdown is being applied to the wrong table [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dynamic Filter Pushdown is being applied to the wrong table [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dynamic Filter Pushdown is being applied to the wrong table [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dynamic Filter Pushdown is being applied to the wrong table [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dynamic Filter Pushdown is being applied to the wrong table [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dynamic Filter Pushdown is being applied to the wrong table [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: better Utf8View support for `regexp_replace`, signature cleanup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: better Utf8View support for `regexp_replace`, signature cleanup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: better Utf8View support for `regexp_replace`, signature cleanup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: better Utf8View support for `regexp_replace`, signature cleanup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: better Utf8View support for `regexp_replace`, signature cleanup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: better Utf8View support for `regexp_replace`, signature cleanup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Utf8View for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `Utf8View` for more args of `regexp_replace` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: Simplify approach to avoiding memory corruption due to buffer reuse [wip] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Simplify approach to avoiding memory corruption due to buffer reuse [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Simplify approach to avoiding memory corruption due to buffer reuse [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Simplify approach to avoiding memory corruption due to buffer reuse [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Simplify approach to avoiding memory corruption due to buffer reuse [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Simplify approach to avoiding memory corruption due to buffer reuse [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Add CopyExec to inputs to SortMergeJoinExec [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add CopyExec to inputs to SortMergeJoinExec [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add CopyExec to inputs to SortMergeJoinExec [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add CopyExec to inputs to SortMergeJoinExec [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add CopyExec to inputs to SortMergeJoinExec [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Add CopyExec to inputs to SortMergeJoinExec [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Tracking PR to update useDecimal128 in Iceberg [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [iceberg] Tracking PR to update Iceberg to enable Comet native execution with Iceberg [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] `string_agg` does not respect `ORDER BY` on `49.0.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `string_agg` does not respect `ORDER BY` on `49.0.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `string_agg` does not respect `ORDER BY` on `49.0.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `string_agg` does not respect `ORDER BY` on `49.0.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `string_agg` does not respect `ORDER BY` on `49.0.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `cargo test --test fuzz` fails with "Too many open files" [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `cargo test --test fuzz` fails with "Too many open files" [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Migrate core test to insta part 3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Migrate core test to insta part 3 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add dynamic filter (bounds) pushdown to HashJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add dynamic filter (bounds) pushdown to HashJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add dynamic filter (bounds) pushdown to HashJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Add config option to log fallback reasons [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add config option to log fallback reasons [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add config option to log fallback reasons [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add config option to log fallback reasons [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add config option to log fallback reasons [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add config option to log fallback reasons [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Testing: Try test optimize performance for coalesce [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Investigate whether we should be wrapping inputs to WindowAggExec in CopyExec [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] minor: fix rustdocs for `window_agg_exec` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: fix rustdocs for `window_agg_exec` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Remove mutable Parquet buffer use from `native_iceberg_compat` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove mutable Parquet buffer use from `native_iceberg_compat` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] [main] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog (#17175) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [main] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog (#17175) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [main] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog (#17175) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [main] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog (#17175) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Inputs to SortMergeJoin should be wrapped in a CopyExec with UnpackOrDeepCopy if the inputs can reuse batches [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Inputs to SortMergeJoin should be wrapped in a CopyExec with UnpackOrDeepCopy if the inputs can reuse batches [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] FFI_RecordBatchStream was causing a memory leak [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FFI_RecordBatchStream was causing a memory leak [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FFI_RecordBatchStream was causing a memory leak [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FFI_RecordBatchStream was causing a memory leak [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Performance of `distinct on (columns)` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] 1000x slowdown opening parquet file due to partitions [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages