On Nov 28, 10:47 pm, "David B. Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 26, 1:58 pm, Alastair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > David Benson wrote in the other thread "All models are wrong. Some are
> > useful."
>
> I was quoting George Box.
So you wrote.
> There are several reason to doubt UAH TLT in comparison with global
> surface temperature products and also RSS. For part of the latter,
> see
>
> http://tamino.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/annual-cycle-in-uah-tlt/
In that thread Tamino argues there should be signal showing more
warming during the Boreal winter. RSS does not show that but UAH
does. So Tamino claims that UAH is implausible!
Can I just point out that if the current models are correct then it
might be implausible but it could just prove that my model is correct!
But I have given up arguing with sceptics. It is a waste of time. The
same seems true of you lot :-( Your minds seem to be as closed as
theirs. It the facts don't suit you they are implausible!
Cheers, Alastair.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
