2008/11/25 Alastair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> You're missing a teensy little point here: the S+C MSU *was* wrong, in
>> multiple ways. As were the lapse rates.
>
> S+C had made a teensy little error with the MSU. So Gavin and crew
> used that as an excuse not only to fix the MSU data, but they also
> revised the radiosonde data.
No, S+C made some very big errors with MSU. Gavin didn't fix the RS.
You're descending into conspiracy theory here; stop before its too
late
-W.
> But that wasn't really satisfactory so they have now published another
> paper where they have averaged the their MSU data with their
> radiosonde data and got the result they want, approximately. Of
> course this means that both their MSU and radiosonde fixes are giving
> the wrong results!
>
> Cheers, Alastair.
>
>
> >
>
--
William M. Connolley | www.wmconnolley.org.uk | 07985 935400
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
