On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, at 7:46pm, Bayard R. Coolidge wrote:
> And, to bring all this back on topic, I'm still trying to figure out why
> folks are straining to retrofit the OpenSSH patches onto Red Hat 6.2.

  Speak for youself.  :-)  We (meaing the company I work for, collectively)  
are not straining.  As I said, with a current RHL 6.2 system, compiling
OpenSSH is absurdly easy.

  As for why we are still using RHL 6.2: Because, by-and-large, it does what
we need.  Switching to a new release would just double our overhead in terms
of configuration management and maintenance, and for almost zero benefit.  
(This is on the server side, mind you -- the latest KDE or GNOME means
nothing to a box that never runs X11.  The Linux desktops we have in the
office are running newer software.)

> Trying to maintain a RH 6.2 system to that level of protection [having the
> latest security patches installed] is a frightening prospect...

  Not really.  ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.2/en/os/ has everything you need.  
Red Hat is generally quite good at providing quick updates when
vulnerabilities are discovered.

  As I've said many times, one of the reasons I switched to Linux was to get
off the upgrade treadmill.  Same principle applies here.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or  |
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |




*****************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body.
*****************************************************************

Reply via email to