it clearly shows Scale for greenyouth is not with you, so please stop this ugly metering 1) ugly metering? this is what is called "hate" Mr MOderator. u should start moderating urself.
2) for ur friend food is not the priority. wht does it indicate? on the one hand u talk abt struggles of people and the other, u side with those whose priority is not at all food? great!! 3) We are not foolish enough to engage u in intellectual discussion, my dear anivar. so please find it and study well. (enough references available) 4) Your Reply to the questionire on greenyouth & its usage so wht abt my latest reply? why resist to updating urself? forget ur intellect, at least ur data.. 5) access to "activism" THAT IS WHY I QUESTION UR MODERATOSHIP (GOTCHA) On 29/09/2007, Anivar Aravind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ranjit Ranjit wrote: > > > > 1) any proof for this statement? > > in fact i could not access net the whole day. So going by the logic of > > anivar, prejudices and whims and fancies make him immaturely handle > > greenyouth. > > Reference: 1. Christy's mail & list study ( even though i disagrees with > alot of its positions as in my previous mail) > 2. Your Reply to the questionire on greenyouth & its usage > > > 2) hegemonic > > the kind of intolerance shown by anivar is indicative of hegemony > > > Explained with the reference to christy's mail > > > 3) reg: ur friend and her child > > der r many who have to go out earn daily bread and butter even if her > > child is ill. so, the logic of access does not stand at all > > Priority matters!!. Internet is not the bread & butter > > > 4) cyber democracy > > it is the only space available for educated Dalitbahujan these days to > > engage with 'democracy' > > u can refer some reserach papers in this regard as well. kindly contact > > Satyanarayana, Dr tirumal or Tejaswini NIranjana > > I have critisisms on various stands i seen yet on this topic. Plz send > the papers , we can discuss after studying them > > > > 5) moderator and his positive way > > what makes u a moderator? wht's r criteria for moderation? why there is > > no transparency? positive way could be anything. ethnic clensing could > > be one positve way to ensure smooth functioning > > The lists rules are there. It is communicated among moderators. but not > written so far. I will post it soon. > > > 6) is the access to "activism" and its power-centres part of ur list of > > vertical structure? So how do u look at ur position as moderator who > > preaches democracy without knowing what it is? > > Yes, Off course. Thats why I opposed your portrayal of Visit of > sugathakumari= hijacking the issue. Sanal is now playing in the vacant > responses of people of Athirappilly > > > > 7) and what is this scale of modernism? is there any other scale > > available? how is it different? > > and which scale is applicable to greenyouth? > > I think it is the scale used by sanal to analyse moderation. > Lets see if he come up with some other scale. > > it clearly shows Scale for greenyouth is not with you, so please stop > this ugly metering > > > Anivar > -- Ranjit --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
