Limiting the response to the Message-Ids of the mails which contained the word "moratorium"
On Tue, Sep 15, 2026, at 18:05, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > Hi Efraim, > > thank you for your explanation, some comments below. > > [...] > >> Maildir it looks like a more formal moratorium was proposed after the end of >> the voting. > > Could youl please share the Message-Id, I guess there I can find the > full text of the moratorium. July 27th: <[email protected]> July 27th: <[email protected]> July 27th: <[email protected]> July 28th: <[email protected]> July 28th: <[email protected]> July 28th: <[email protected]> July 28th: <amkmJ0Gi5To0mpzA@jurong> July 29th: <[email protected]> July 29th: <[email protected]> July 29th: <CAJ=Rwfb54FFkpMBEXwPJTPh37wztqsd=jcianizewbnpxgh...@mail.gmail.com> July 29th: <[email protected]> July 30th: <amuioneXF7WPN7hZ@andel> Aug 1st: <[email protected]> > Furthermore, was the moratorium published "somewhere"? Does it have an > expiration date? It looks like there were a large number of emails in favor of having a moratorium, with some suggestion that GNU already had/has a moratorium and that it could apply to us too. It does not look like it progressed beyond the listed emails. I'm going to ask everyone not to re-litigate GCD 008 or the voting as part of this
