On Tue Sep 15, 2026 at 8:13 AM -05, Efraim Flashner wrote: > This commit was pushed about 3 months ago in the beginning of June; I'm > not sure where we were in the process of GCD 008 at that point. Looking > quickly through my Maildir it looks like a more formal moratorium was > proposed after the end of the voting.
That doesn't directly answer the question. It _implies_ that there is no moratorium. Could the you, or ideally the guix team as whole, answer the question directly. And an additional question asked by David Thompson on the #11154. Moving foward can we expect that LLM-assisted commits will be accepted into Guix? A curt yes or no answer would suffice. As you mentioned in another email there is no need to religate the LLM issue. We just want to understand where the Guix project currently stands. Although I appreciate the effort that goes into writing a longer, nuanced answer, I also understand how stressful doing so can be. --- > It was obviously not my intention for anyone to feel like they needed > to quit over this commit, and I am sad to see Ian go. It would be best to not focus the discussion on a specific commit or your actions. Putting the spotlight is not only stressful for those being scrutinized, but also unnecessary and unhelpful. The focus should be about where the project stands moving foward. It is clear that you and everyone else in the Guix team acts with good intentions. So I hope you aren't feeling like you are personally responsible for anyone leaving. As Cayetano Santos mentioned on the fediverse, this is not the only commit with LLM-assistance in Guix master. There also f528be103a69. Additionally Nicolas Graves also left the Guix project because they were under the impression that they couldn't use LLMs to contribute to Guix[1]. So this is an issue where any decision will lead to people leaving the project. Cheers, Javier [1]: https://lists.sr.ht/~ngraves/news/%[email protected]%3E
