On Jul 25, 12:48 pm, Arthus Erea <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we get some more votes on this?
(Not what you wanted to vote on, but in agreement with what you said before) Isn't the new plugins/themes area of the website supposed to allow both "habari community" plugins as well as credited plugins? Right now, there's nothing stopping anyone from creating a plugin/theme with attribution, however, they can't upload it to /extras/. The way I've heard it, the future will consist of a hp.o site with 3 different categories of submission: core (habari itself), "extras" equivalent (by the community, for the community, no attribution), and anything else people want to upload within reason. Because of the expected ability to allow people to upload plugins/themes with attribution in the future, I don't see a pressing need to change -extras. (Now, what you are proposing a vote on:) > 5: In light of these reasons, I propose that we change the > requirements for core extensions. Please vote on the following proposal: > 5.1— Always include "Habari Community" as one author of the extension. > 5.2— At the discretion of the community, credit additional significant > contributors, at their consent, by name and url. Habari should be a product attributed solely to the entity who's creation is currently being discussed in another thread. Core extensions should be held to the same standards as the core itself, not merely held to the standards of -extras. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
