Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell

[Philip Wadler]

  That's just what I intend to do.  I don't see Std Haskell as a big
  deal, but even little deals are worth completing rather than
  leaving as loose ends... and I'm more optimistic than Paul about
  the usefulness of Std Haskell.  I would be happy to find a name
  that was less grand and final-sounding than 'Standard Haskell' though;
  but more final sounding than 'Haskell 1.5'.

Actually, Haskell 1.5 sounds exactly like what you want: halfway
between the first draft and the next edition.  It also resonates
with those of use who remember Lisp 1.5, which was the `Standard
Lisp' for many years.  -- P