Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell

[Jon . Fairbairn]

On  4 Aug, Philip Wadler wrote:
>   I would be happy to find a name
>   that was less grand and final-sounding than 'Standard Haskell' though;
>   but more final sounding than 'Haskell 1.5'.
> 
> Actually, Haskell 1.5 sounds exactly like what you want: halfway
> between the first draft and the next edition.  It also resonates
> with those of use who remember Lisp 1.5, which was the `Standard
> Lisp' for many years.  -- P

I think I agree; the other alternative would to be literal and call it
Haskell 1 Final, or 1F for short.


-- 
Jon Fairbairn                                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]