Lennart wrote: > It's not only people who use Haskell for teaching that want stability. > If you've used Haskell for some real project where the current Haskell > is adequate (which, IMHO, is quite a few) you may not want to rewrite > gazillion lines of code. I'd like to second that. I have two projects (http://www.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~joe/rx/index.html and http://www.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~joe/juggling/drops/index.html) don't know how much they could be called "real", (they're real for me at least) but I'd very much prefer a stable Haskell for them. best regards, -- Dr. Johannes Waldmann Institut fur Informatik Universitat Leipzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~joe/ Augustusplatz, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany, Tel/Fax (+49) 341 97 32 204/209
- Re: RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Daan Leijen
- RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Frank A. Christoph
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell David Bruce
- Re: RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Fergus Henderson
- re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Scott Turner
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell John O'Donnell
- re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell S. Achterop IWI-120 3932
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Johannes Waldmann
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Philip Wadler
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Claus Reinke
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Gabor Greif