Scott Turner wrote:

>At 18:08 1998-08-04 +0900, Frank A. Christoph wrote:
>>>[...] 'Standard Haskell' [...] 'Haskell 1.5'.
>>[...] Haskell--?  [...]  (-1) Haskell [...] Pre-Haskell
>
>Others wrote "Haskell 98" and "Teaching Haskell".
>
>"Haskell 2000" uses a nice, round number that is close enough, given that
>Haskell 2 won't be finished until well after that year.

The version of Haskell with with we will be able to reach a significant
larger audience
will be a version that will have at least MPC's, such as used in
graphical user interfaces etc.
Therefore, IMHO, we should reserve a "glamourous" name such as Standard
Haskell for that
version of the language. Why not just Haskell for the current version?

My 2cts.

 Sietse Achterop


----
Sietse's signature file.


Reply via email to