Scott Turner wrote: >At 18:08 1998-08-04 +0900, Frank A. Christoph wrote: >>>[...] 'Standard Haskell' [...] 'Haskell 1.5'. >>[...] Haskell--? [...] (-1) Haskell [...] Pre-Haskell > >Others wrote "Haskell 98" and "Teaching Haskell". > >"Haskell 2000" uses a nice, round number that is close enough, given that >Haskell 2 won't be finished until well after that year. The version of Haskell with with we will be able to reach a significant larger audience will be a version that will have at least MPC's, such as used in graphical user interfaces etc. Therefore, IMHO, we should reserve a "glamourous" name such as Standard Haskell for that version of the language. Why not just Haskell for the current version? My 2cts. Sietse Achterop ---- Sietse's signature file.
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Daan Leijen
- RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Frank A. Christoph
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell David Bruce
- Re: RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Fergus Henderson
- re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Scott Turner
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell John O'Donnell
- Re: RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell S. Achterop IWI-120 3932
- Re: RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Johannes Waldmann
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Philip Wadler
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Claus Reinke
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Paul Hudak
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Gabor Greif