0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Paul Gilmartin) writes: > 8x11mm Minox camera? I suppose physical security can interdict that. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minox#Technical_details_of_Minox_8.C3.9711_cameras
re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017g.html#74 Running unsupported is dangerous was Re: AW: Re: LE strikes again also in the wake of the company's "pentagon papers" type event, they retrofitted all company copier machines with serial number identifier on the underside of the glass, that would show up on all pages copied. example from this copied document over a decade later http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/grayft84.pdf trivia: not long after I graduated and joined the science center, the company got a new CSO ... as common in that era, had previously been at government agency & familiar with physical security (at one time head of presidential detail). I got tagged to run around with him for a time ... to talk about computer security. more trivia: I found my wifes father's WW2 status reports (from europe) at National Archives. They had been declassified but never "marked". The NA "reading room" required that cameras had to be registered (including serial number) and given permit and I had to have declassification tag that appeared in every image that I took. http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/dectag.jpg part of one of his reports http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010i.html#82 -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
