Dear Surajit ji,

Please check this paper:
http://journal-phytology.com/index.php/phyto/article/view/6070/3109
It answers most of your questions. As you can see, leaf character is
important, but also features of flowers, fruits etc. to be considered for
correct diagnosis.

I still think your plant is Phyllanthus amarus. But, let's hear from others
too...

Please also see the poster published by FRLHT...available at
https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/files

Regards

Vijayasankar Raman
National Center for Natural Products Research
University of Mississippi


On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM, surajit koley <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Vijayasankar Ji,
>
> I was digging a bit more on *P. niruri* L. and *P. amarus* Schum. & Thonn.
>
> I found a number of papers on medicinal properties of *P. niruri* L.,
> published by CSIR, some of those are recent publications -
>
>    1. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/4539
>    2. http://www.csircentral.net/index.php/record/view/18194
>    3. without using L. or Linn. -
>    http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/3400
>
> *P. niruri* L. in other sites -
>
>    1. http://www.namahjournal.com/doc/Actual/Phyllanthus-vol-19-iss-3.html
>    2. http://www.pharmainfo.net/reviews/phyllanthus-niruri
>    3.
>    
> http://www.slideshare.net/AlexanderDecker/11protective-effect-of-phyllanthus-niruri-on-dmba-croton-oil-mediated-carcinogenic-response-and-oxidative-damage-in-accordance-to-histopathological-studies-in-skin-of-mice
>
> At the same time i kept in my mind what i learned in group threads, that *P.
> niruri* L. doesn't occur in India, even though it had been mentioned in "THE
> USEFUL PLANTS OF INDIA" ( CSIR publication ). So, i searched more on *
> Phyllanthus* species -
>
>    1. Google directed me to an ebook, *"Phyllanthus Species: Scientific
>    Evaluation and Medicinal Applications" (By Ramadasan Kuttan, K. B.
>    Harikumar)* that supports the claim. The same book also describes 
> *Phyllanthus
>    amarus* Schum. & Thonn. I copy a few words -* *".... leaf blade 5-9 x
>    2-4 mm, oblong, obtuse at both ends...." = page 26 & 27 =
>    
> http://books.google.co.in/books?id=ordQCHqPy9gC&pg=PA31&lpg=PA31&dq=Phyllanthus+niruri+L+species+description&source=bl&ots=i1nPFFuQLy&sig=k06juMKogPFUEK3Puul3nL99k84&hl=en&sa=X&ei=yfF2UOuPB8yqrAfw0IGoCA&ved=0CFIQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=Phyllanthus%20niruri%20L%20species%20description&f=false
>    2. Another document describes *Phyllanthus spp.* in Tiruchirappalli
>    district. I copy a few words on  *Phyllanthus amarus* Schum. & Thonn.
>    = ".... stem terete, hispidulous, ... leaf tip rounded..." =
>    http://journal-phytology.com/index.php/phyto/article/viewFile/6070/3109
>
>
> *Phyllanthus amarus* Schum. & Thonn. in -
>
>    1. FoC = Leaves distichous; stipules linear or linear-lanceolate,
>    green; petioles ca. 0.5 mm; leaf blade oblong or elliptic-oblong, 3-8 ×
>    2-4.5 mm, membranous or thinly papery, base rounded, apex obtuse or
>    rounded and often apiculate =
>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242337368
>    2. FoP = Similar to Phyllanthus fraternus, but completely 
> glabrous,foliage-leaves smaller (3-6 x 1.5-3 mm), oblong=
>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=242337368
>    3. *Phyllanthus fraternus* Webster in FoP =  leaf-blades
>    elliptic-oblong to elliptic-oblanceolate, 5-13 x 1.5-5 mm, obtuse or
>    rounded at apex and base =
>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=242442520
>
> Whom should i follow for the ID of my species? I think my species doesn't
> have terete stem, not sure about apices of leaves.
>
> Regards,
>
> surajit
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:55 AM, surajit koley <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Good morning/evening Vijayasankar Ji,
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> But, if it is *Phyllanthus amarus* then FoC and FoP both are not much
>> reliable source, specially for leaf sizes, more evident in my grass & *
>> Sesbania* uploads.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> surajit
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Vijayasankar 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Nice pictures Surajit ji!
>>> Your visit to the pond might have surprised the young Varanus! Please
>>> tell him/her you were clicking *Phyllanthus amarus. *
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Vijayasankar Raman
>>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>>> University of Mississippi
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:30 PM, surajit koley <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sir,
>>>>
>>>> Searched for *Phyllanthus niruri* L. and found :-
>>>>
>>>>    1. ".... There is no confusion regarding *P. niruri because it
>>>>    doesn't occur in India*. *All plants which earlier called in that
>>>>    name are belong to (and to be called as) P. amarus*, as we all
>>>>    know...." =
>>>>    https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/uRuNBBRR_3k/discussion
>>>>    2. *P. amarus* in FoP = ".... Similar to Phyllanthus fraternus, but
>>>>    completely glabrous, *foliage-leaves smaller (3-6 x 1.5-3 mm)*,
>>>>    oblong...." =
>>>>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=242337368
>>>>    3. *P. amarus* in FoC = " ......  leaf blade oblong or
>>>>    elliptic-oblong, *3-8 × 2-4.5 mm*.........." =
>>>>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242337368
>>>>    4. " ............ *P. fraternus has 6 tepals* and the
>>>>    elliptic/obovate leaves will have a narrowed base....... " =
>>>>    https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/1x7grsFDm6Q/discussion
>>>>    5. *P. fraternus* in FoP = "........ leaf-blades elliptic-oblong to
>>>>    elliptic-oblanceolate, *5-13 x 1.5-5 mm*..." =
>>>>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=242442520
>>>>    6. ".... *Phyllanthus fraternus (syn: P. niruri Hook.f. (non
>>>>    Linn.), quite distinct from P. amarus in larger leaves, 6 perianth, 6-10
>>>>    lobed disc*............ " =
>>>>    https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/vFK2qO-sz18/discussion
>>>>    7. another group post =
>>>>    https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/xpGcxOGpkJI/discussion
>>>>    8. another =
>>>>    https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/49hDzECkogE/discussion
>>>>    9. yet another =
>>>>    https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/c_6anbyYgoc/discussion
>>>>    10. In FoI =
>>>>    http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Gulf%20Leaf-Flower.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Species : UNKNOWN
>>>> Habit & Habitat : wild herb, both branched and unbranched, very common
>>>> on roadside, waste places; height about 1 foot or more; leaves = 10mm x 5
>>>> mm (image no. DSCN1627.jpg); tepals = 5 (image no. DSCN1635.jpg)
>>>> Date : 8-Sept-12, 2.00 p.m.
>>>> Place : Hooghly
>>>>
>>>> Well, as i was recording these images a young water 
>>>> monitor<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_monitor>was waiting for me!
>>>>
>>>> Thank you & Regards,
>>>>
>>>> surajit
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 



Reply via email to