Good morning/evening Vijayasankar Ji,
Thank you very very very much for the endless support.

Regards,
surajit


On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Vijayasankar <[email protected]>wrote:

> Thanks for the ID confirmation Surajit ji.
> I really appreciate your keen interest and devotion.
>
> Regards
>
> Vijayasankar Raman
> National Center for Natural Products Research
> University of Mississippi
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:01 PM, surajit koley <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> SORRY VIJAY SIR,
>>
>> I did a big mistake, took wrong interpretation of the term "terete stem".
>> This is *Phyllanthus amarus* Schum. & Thonn.
>> Attaching some more new pics taken today (12/10/12)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> surajit
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:40 AM, surajit koley <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Many many thanks Vijayasankar Ji.
>>>
>>> I regret that the doc is not accessible to common people.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> surajit
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Vijayasankar 
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The following paper includes keys and descriptions of both the species:
>>>> A Revision of Phyllanthus (Euphorbiaceae) in the Continental United
>>>> States <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2805721>
>>>> Grady L. Webster 
>>>> Brittonia<http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublication?journalCode=brittonia>Vol.
>>>>  22, No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1970), pp. 44-76
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Vijayasankar Raman
>>>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>>>> University of Mississippi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:54 PM, surajit koley <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you once again Vijayasankar Ji.
>>>>> Documents are saying that *P. niruri* L. is not found in India.
>>>>> If i could find some morphological description of *P. niruri* L.!
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> surajit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Vijayasankar <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Surajit ji,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please check this paper:
>>>>>> http://journal-phytology.com/index.php/phyto/article/view/6070/3109
>>>>>> It answers most of your questions. As you can see, leaf character is
>>>>>> important, but also features of flowers, fruits etc. to be considered for
>>>>>> correct diagnosis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I still think your plant is Phyllanthus amarus. But, let's hear from
>>>>>> others too...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please also see the poster published by FRLHT...available at
>>>>>> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/files
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vijayasankar Raman
>>>>>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>>>>>> University of Mississippi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear Vijayasankar Ji,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was digging a bit more on *P. niruri* L. and *P. amarus* Schum. &
>>>>>>> Thonn.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I found a number of papers on medicinal properties of *P. niruri* L.,
>>>>>>> published by CSIR, some of those are recent publications -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    1. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/4539
>>>>>>>    2. http://www.csircentral.net/index.php/record/view/18194
>>>>>>>    3. without using L. or Linn. -
>>>>>>>    http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/3400
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *P. niruri* L. in other sites -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    1.
>>>>>>>    http://www.namahjournal.com/doc/Actual/Phyllanthus-vol-19-iss-3.html
>>>>>>>    2. http://www.pharmainfo.net/reviews/phyllanthus-niruri
>>>>>>>    3.
>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>> http://www.slideshare.net/AlexanderDecker/11protective-effect-of-phyllanthus-niruri-on-dmba-croton-oil-mediated-carcinogenic-response-and-oxidative-damage-in-accordance-to-histopathological-studies-in-skin-of-mice
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At the same time i kept in my mind what i learned in group threads,
>>>>>>> that *P. niruri* L. doesn't occur in India, even though it had been
>>>>>>> mentioned in "THE USEFUL PLANTS OF INDIA" ( CSIR publication ). So,
>>>>>>> i searched more on *Phyllanthus* species -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    1. Google directed me to an ebook, *"Phyllanthus Species:
>>>>>>>    Scientific Evaluation and Medicinal Applications" (By Ramadasan 
>>>>>>> Kuttan, K.
>>>>>>>    B. Harikumar)* that supports the claim. The same book also
>>>>>>>    describes *Phyllanthus amarus* Schum. & Thonn. I copy a few
>>>>>>>    words -* *".... leaf blade 5-9 x 2-4 mm, oblong, obtuse at both
>>>>>>>    ends...." = page 26 & 27 =
>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>> http://books.google.co.in/books?id=ordQCHqPy9gC&pg=PA31&lpg=PA31&dq=Phyllanthus+niruri+L+species+description&source=bl&ots=i1nPFFuQLy&sig=k06juMKogPFUEK3Puul3nL99k84&hl=en&sa=X&ei=yfF2UOuPB8yqrAfw0IGoCA&ved=0CFIQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=Phyllanthus%20niruri%20L%20species%20description&f=false
>>>>>>>    2. Another document describes *Phyllanthus spp.* in
>>>>>>>    Tiruchirappalli district. I copy a few words on  *Phyllanthus
>>>>>>>    amarus* Schum. & Thonn. = ".... stem terete, hispidulous, ...
>>>>>>>    leaf tip rounded..." =
>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>> http://journal-phytology.com/index.php/phyto/article/viewFile/6070/3109
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Phyllanthus amarus* Schum. & Thonn. in -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    1. FoC = Leaves distichous; stipules linear or
>>>>>>>    linear-lanceolate, green; petioles ca. 0.5 mm; leaf blade oblong or
>>>>>>>    elliptic-oblong, 3-8 × 2-4.5 mm, membranous or thinly papery, base
>>>>>>>    rounded, apex obtuse or rounded and often apiculate =
>>>>>>>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242337368
>>>>>>>    2. FoP = Similar to Phyllanthus fraternus, but completely
>>>>>>>    glabrous, foliage-leaves smaller (3-6 x 1.5-3 mm), oblong =
>>>>>>>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=242337368
>>>>>>>    3. *Phyllanthus fraternus* Webster in FoP =  leaf-blades
>>>>>>>    elliptic-oblong to elliptic-oblanceolate, 5-13 x 1.5-5 mm, obtuse
>>>>>>>    or rounded at apex and base =
>>>>>>>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=242442520
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whom should i follow for the ID of my species? I think my species
>>>>>>> doesn't have terete stem, not sure about apices of leaves.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:55 AM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Good morning/evening Vijayasankar Ji,
>>>>>>>> Thank you very much.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But, if it is *Phyllanthus amarus* then FoC and FoP both are not
>>>>>>>> much reliable source, specially for leaf sizes, more evident in my 
>>>>>>>> grass &
>>>>>>>> *Sesbania* uploads.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Vijayasankar <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nice pictures Surajit ji!
>>>>>>>>> Your visit to the pond might have surprised the young Varanus!
>>>>>>>>> Please tell him/her you were clicking *Phyllanthus amarus. *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Vijayasankar Raman
>>>>>>>>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>>>>>>>>> University of Mississippi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:30 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sir,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Searched for *Phyllanthus niruri* L. and found :-
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    1. ".... There is no confusion regarding *P. niruri because
>>>>>>>>>>    it doesn't occur in India*. *All plants which earlier called
>>>>>>>>>>    in that name are belong to (and to be called as) P. amarus*,
>>>>>>>>>>    as we all know...." =
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/uRuNBBRR_3k/discussion
>>>>>>>>>>    2. *P. amarus* in FoP = ".... Similar to Phyllanthus
>>>>>>>>>>    fraternus, but completely glabrous, *foliage-leaves smaller
>>>>>>>>>>    (3-6 x 1.5-3 mm)*, oblong...." =
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=242337368
>>>>>>>>>>    3. *P. amarus* in FoC = " ......  leaf blade oblong or
>>>>>>>>>>    elliptic-oblong, *3-8 × 2-4.5 mm*.........." =
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242337368
>>>>>>>>>>    4. " ............ *P. fraternus has 6 tepals* and the
>>>>>>>>>>    elliptic/obovate leaves will have a narrowed base....... " =
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/1x7grsFDm6Q/discussion
>>>>>>>>>>    5. *P. fraternus* in FoP = "........ leaf-blades
>>>>>>>>>>    elliptic-oblong to elliptic-oblanceolate, *5-13 x 1.5-5 mm*..."
>>>>>>>>>>    =
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=242442520
>>>>>>>>>>    6. ".... *Phyllanthus fraternus (syn: P. niruri Hook.f. (non
>>>>>>>>>>    Linn.), quite distinct from P. amarus in larger leaves, 6 
>>>>>>>>>> perianth, 6-10
>>>>>>>>>>    lobed disc*............ " =
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/vFK2qO-sz18/discussion
>>>>>>>>>>    7. another group post =
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/xpGcxOGpkJI/discussion
>>>>>>>>>>    8. another =
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/49hDzECkogE/discussion
>>>>>>>>>>    9. yet another =
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/c_6anbyYgoc/discussion
>>>>>>>>>>    10. In FoI =
>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Gulf%20Leaf-Flower.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Species : UNKNOWN
>>>>>>>>>> Habit & Habitat : wild herb, both branched and unbranched, very
>>>>>>>>>> common on roadside, waste places; height about 1 foot or more; 
>>>>>>>>>> leaves =
>>>>>>>>>> 10mm x 5 mm (image no. DSCN1627.jpg); tepals = 5 (image no. 
>>>>>>>>>> DSCN1635.jpg)
>>>>>>>>>> Date : 8-Sept-12, 2.00 p.m.
>>>>>>>>>> Place : Hooghly
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well, as i was recording these images a young water 
>>>>>>>>>> monitor<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_monitor>was waiting for 
>>>>>>>>>> me!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you & Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 



Reply via email to