Ok, how about 2 levels, optimally divided that would be
181 directories of 181 entries. Not too horrible, a
directory listing will even just barely fit on the screen.
still, it's kind of slow.
Why would you ever want to list one of these directories? I would think the
size limit would be dictated by transfer and lookup time.
- Re: Home directory layouts... Mark Giuffrida
- Re: Home directory layouts... John Hascall
- Re: Home directory layouts... Lyle_Seaman
- Re: Home directory layouts... John Hascall
- Re: Home directory layouts... Lyle Seaman
- Re: Home directory layouts... John Hascall
- Re: Home directory layouts... Roland J. Schemers III
- Re: Home directory layouts... John Gardiner Myers
- Re: Home directory layouts... Roland J. Schemers III
- Re: Home directory layouts... Barry Howard
- Re: Home directory layouts... Jim . Rees
- Re: Home directory layouts... Ral Geis
- Re: Home directory layouts... Jim . Rees
- Re: Home directory layouts... Roland J. Schemers III
- Re: Home directory layouts... Michael T. Stolarchuk
- Re: Home directory layouts... Marc Horowitz
- Re: Home directory layouts... Randall S. Winchester
