I forwarded John Hascall's mail to the list since it actually was of
general interest. I thought maybe he was just running into an old bug.
Anyway, John writes:
Excerpts from transarc.external.info-afs: 19-Jul-94 Re: Home directory
layouts... Lyle Seaman (2001)
> Well, in my mind, that scheme is a kluge, but for those without
> a naming service (like Hesiod or someday perhaps DCE CDS) I
> can see why it has some appeal.
More of a kludge than splitting up the UID?
Excerpts from transarc.external.info-afs: 19-Jul-94 Re: Home directory
layouts... Lyle Seaman (2001)
> Now, the question is how to achieve an even balancing of users
among these directories.
I don't see why they need to be balanced evenly. I suspect that's
compulsivity, but maybe you can justify it? It seems to me that
everything is hunky-dory so long as the max is acceptably low.
- Home directory layouts... Roland Schemers
- Re: Home directory layouts... John Hascall
- Re: Home directory layouts... What's in a name?
- Re: Home directory layouts... Mark Giuffrida
- Re: Home directory layouts... John Hascall
- Re: Home directory layouts... Lyle_Seaman
- Re: Home directory layouts... John Hascall
- Re: Home directory layouts... Lyle Seaman
- Re: Home directory layout... John Hascall
- Re: Home directory layout... Roland J. Schemers III
- Re: Home directory layouts... John Gardiner Myers
- Re: Home directory layouts... Roland J. Schemers III
- Re: Home directory layouts... Barry Howard
- Re: Home directory layouts... Jim . Rees
- Re: Home directory layouts... Ral Geis
- Re: Home directory layouts... Jim . Rees
- Re: Home directory layouts... Roland J. Schemers III
- Re: Home directory layouts... Michael T. Stolarchuk
