Hi, Licenses agreements are really a puzzle for me :-( .
Thanks Stefan for finding this old exchange of mails. I don't understand clearly Oliver argument. Why the terms "and at no charge to the public" should be a concern? Do we charge OpenJUMP users? Do we need to remove dll or do we need to include its license in the distribution so that distributors who want to charge their users know they have to remove them first? (OK, currently we even do not do that in OJ license part) Another question is : do we have a link to these dll licenses. For 1.4.1 distro, I Googled to find them but just found licenses about their new products. Would be interesting to know if license has changed and what is the license for these old dll. Maybe we should contact ermapper for that? Last question is : is there a difference between including dll in the distribution and giving a link to a repository of JPP project? I think that usage for restricted license if to give a link to the copyright owner site. Problem is that these dll are not distributed anymore by ermapper. Too bad, each time I look for a clear answer to a simple license question, I get three more questions and still no answer :-( . Michaël Le 15/09/2011 06:39, Rahkonen Jukka a écrit : > Hi, > > So the point was that the ECW license said "licensed under a license similar > to a General Public > License ("GPL") and at no charge to the public" but GPL allows anybody to > start selling OpenJUMP. > > We may by right with the decision but we are alone. GvSIG, Kosmo and QGIS all > seem to come witd ECW dlls. > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > Stefan Steiniger wrote: > >> ok.. found something in our list history on the license. >> http://www.mail-archive.com/jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00616.html >> Thats why we have also a "dummy class" for the nightly build > stefan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop > What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses > from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops > provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable > virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop > What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses > from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops > provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable > virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel