On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 3:45 PM, 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes Maintainers <
kubernetes-maintain...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Joseph Jacks <jacks....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks! I do hear you, Tim --- however, I find that such an experiment is
> > worthy in the face of the challenges the project has in this area. Why
> not
> > have both extrinsic and intrinsic, then see what happens?
>
> That was the point of the study. Intrinsic motivators alone ("help
> make the world a better place") were MORE effective than combined
> motivators ("help make the world a better place, and here's 100 bucks
> for your effort").
>
> > Would love more feedback.
>
> Something I wanted to do but fell off my plate is to set up a kube
> "janitors" effort. This has been pretty effective in the Linux
> kernel, finding ways for people who didn't know the whole kernel to
> contribute, clean up, and earn an identity ("I'm on the kernel
> janitors team!"), and take a ton of tasks off the backlog. It needs a
> rally point, a website, a logo, and some serious effort cataloging
> initial work items.
>
And significant guidance, review, and PR bandwidth.
>
>
> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Tim Hockin <thoc...@google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Curiously, I was JUST listening to a radio piece exploring the effects
> >> of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators. It is well understood that
> >> "common purpose" and "for the greater good" (intrinsic motivators) are
> >> more effective than money and stuff (extrinsic motivators). The
> >> interesting part was that the addition of an extrinsic motivator to a
> >> situation which was already intrinsically motivated REDUCED the net
> >> motivation.
> >>
> >> So we should be careful that applying money to our community doesn't
> >> change it from a righteous mission into a low-paying job.
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Lucas Käldström <lu...@luxaslabs.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Adding kubernetes-dev and kubernetes-maintainers...
> >> >
> >> > On May 28 2017, at 12:31 am, Joseph Jacks <jacks....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> https://twitter.com/kubernetesonarm/status/868577771953455105
> >> >>
> >> >> Lucas and I got to DM'ing earlier and came up with this over the last
> >> >> hour. Feedback welcome!
> >> >>
> >> >> Doc:
> >> >>
> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VQDIAB0OqiSjIHI8AWMvSdceWhnz5
> 6jNpZrLs6o7NJY/edit#heading=h.en8cy6hno0c6
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > Groups
> >> > "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> >> > an
> >> > email to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.
> com.
> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Kubernetes Maintainers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to kubernetes-maintainers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-maintainers@
> googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/kubernetes-maintainers/CAO_RewYwjWcntqpPbm_BAWd%
> 2BtJXLGYvjkMK8hMN41OUGLoZMhw%40mail.gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
