On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 10:34:31 AM UTC-4, Justin Santa Barbara 
(FathomDB) wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 2:13:39 AM UTC-4, Brian Grant wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Are there thing we could do to improve k8sport adoption? Would k8sport and 21 
> compete for people to accomplish the same tasks?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I haven't been able to get an invite to k8sport.  Digging out the debugging 
> tools, it looks like it might not like last names with a space.  Regardless 
> of my personal naming peculiarities, a sign-up process with a delay is going 
> to cause a huge drop-off.
> 
> 
> I think I tried to register before, was told to expect an email soon, never 
> got it and forgot about it.  Luxas mentioned something about giving k8sport 
> money to charity, so I had another look.
> 
> 
> If we want to increase k8sport adoption, I think making registration instant 
> (at least for a critical mass of users e.g. k8s contributors), and the 
> occasional tweet or other memory-jog, would go a long way.



Justin:
 
I’m sorry to hear you had trouble signing up, initially.

Currently, we’re using K8sPort.org to request the registration. By requesting 
at that site, a few folks are automatically notified and can send you an invite 
through the hub, itself. The “instant signup” was discussed, early on, but the 
concern there was a potential flood of fake invites, which occurs fairly 
regularly, or even individuals creating multiple accounts.  It’s something we 
could reconsider, and would be easy to enable, although it could remove some 
oversight the hub currently has.
 
Brian: 
 
Since being announced via a blog post around the 1.6 release, the hub has 
already seen close to 500 organic invite requests.  Ideally, getting the K8 
port listed at the Kubernetes github, and on more of the formal CNCF properties 
would also be very helpful re: sign up rate. I think we’d start to see the rate 
increase quite a bit, then. 

The integration with github is really key (and powerful), as people can 
instantly be recognized for contributions being made to the project once they 
link their account. There was also discussion around connecting the emerging 
formal contributor levels to the badges/advocate structure of the K8sport, 
which I think would help.

I think there’s definitely a way to tie these initiatives together, and create 
more opportunities for folks to contribute to great causes (as Lucas has 
already done via the K8s port) – while participating in a great community 
around a project they love. It’s also worth noting that, for Meetups and 
events, the K8sPort allows you to “check in” at the locations and, in so doing, 
gain access to event-specific challenges.
 
Additionally, I’m always more than happy to hop on a quick call anytime to 
discuss this, and any input/advice anyone may have.
-RQ

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
      • Re: ... lucas
      • Re: ... lucas
      • Re: ... 'David Aronchick' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
      • Re: ... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
      • Re: ... Alexis Richardson
      • Re: ... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
      • Re: ... Alexis Richardson
      • Re: ... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
      • Re: ... 'Brian Grant' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
      • Re: ... Justin Santa Barbara
      • Re: ... quacken1983
      • Re: ... Ryan Quackenbush
  • Re: [kubernet... 'Brian Grant' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A

Reply via email to