Hoi,
A lot may have been discussed in Berlin but this was not communicated
afterwards .. So no.
Thanks,
     GerardM

On 18 December 2017 at 14:52, Steven White <koala19...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Jon Harald, I think I was told at one point that this was discussed in
> Berlin, and would be acceptable for the purpose of helping to support this
> project in an Australian aboriginal language. But as I was not in Berlin,
> I'd like some LangCom member who was there to confirm this.
>
>
> Gnangarra, other than with respect to that question, it looks like things
> are ready by the numbers:  decent number of pages, not mostly stubs, "most
> used" translation complete, sufficient activity. Here was my main
> concern:  In my random check of pages, I found some BLP pages that I was
> not entirely comfortable with. Now, I can appreciate that there may be
> personalities you want to highlight in this project that are mostly notable
> within the context of the community, rather than at large. But there are
> still good reasons that BLP requires reliable sourcing, and I thought some
> of the BLP pages I saw were kind of shaky in that regard. I don't think I'd
> withhold project approval for that, but between now and project creation,
> and then in the first year of the new wiki, I'd really want to see some of
> that tightened up.
>
>
> Steven
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to