I don't remember such a discussion either. 2017-12-18 17:30 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>:
> Hoi, > A lot may have been discussed in Berlin but this was not communicated > afterwards .. So no. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 18 December 2017 at 14:52, Steven White <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jon Harald, I think I was told at one point that this was discussed in >> Berlin, and would be acceptable for the purpose of helping to support this >> project in an Australian aboriginal language. But as I was not in Berlin, >> I'd like some LangCom member who was there to confirm this. >> >> >> Gnangarra, other than with respect to that question, it looks like things >> are ready by the numbers: decent number of pages, not mostly stubs, "most >> used" translation complete, sufficient activity. Here was my main >> concern: In my random check of pages, I found some BLP pages that I was >> not entirely comfortable with. Now, I can appreciate that there may be >> personalities you want to highlight in this project that are mostly notable >> within the context of the community, rather than at large. But there are >> still good reasons that BLP requires reliable sourcing, and I thought some >> of the BLP pages I saw were kind of shaky in that regard. I don't think I'd >> withhold project approval for that, but between now and project creation, >> and then in the first year of the new wiki, I'd really want to see some of >> that tightened up. >> >> >> Steven >> >> >> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
