On 18/10/2011 18:53, David C Abernathy wrote: > This may be a dumb question, BUT, why is this "No issue" such a > needed entry? If there are NO children listed in a database, I assume > that there are NO children for this union.
"This couple are known to have had no children" is a very different thing to "If this couple had any children I don't know about it yet, but they might well have done." -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
