At 04:09 PM 1/11/00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I can't promise this at all, but the development group might
> be entitled to a non-distributable pre-beta copy of command
> if it would help the site. No promises, though.
you will need either that or
an installed apache/mod_rebol that was stable.
I can do the rest with named-pipes.
presuming the unix box dos not have a command line
length limitation (some suns do)
the other params can be copied via args.
(stdin will not work since that is reserved for CGI POST)
At 03:56 PM 1/11/00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I wouldn't put it quite that negatively. You certainly appear to know alot
>about the architecture. We all agree that REBOL is quite capable.
I know a lot (about clubware architectures)
because I make my living nowadays
setting up portals, publishing companies
and club sites.
some use wiki, some use oracle, some use php,
some use cold fusion.
whatever the (paying) customer wants.
otherwise I use what is free and already developed.
I inherited a perl based wiki from markus over at jos.org
(java-os). I used it to make the first mozilla
developers club site ( mozilla.devel.org ).
>Why not divide the functionality up into
>
>1. Minimal core functionality
you have that in wiki.r
my only suggestion would be
to not use [] as the link delimiters
as it messes up rebol example code.
(unless you like to say [ for [ ;)
I have found %hyperlink% is best
(after doing it a few years). %% makes a %
>2. Extended core functionality
look in your collective inboxes tomorrow.
>2. Necessary additional functions.
>3. Added value functionality
see above
At 07:48 PM 1/11/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On 1/11/2000 at 7:16 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>So, Just to be clear, we're talking about Wiki, then?
yes but not wiki.r
there are several other wiki's out there.
one in php, 5 in perl, one in python (I think),
2 in smalltalk/squeak and a couple in C.
some of the features I listed can be found
in other wiki's as well as kehei wiki.
a group of us maintain kehei wiki (in perl).
one of the group (not me) is doing a php
version for sport.
>How does Andrew Grossman's Wiki script fit into this?
mainly it offers updates in place but not security.
ok for 1.0,
needs to be used in more than just the dictionary.
has no templates.
does not flatten topics (needs to) to files in single directory
[so administrators have fewer nitemares].
no authorship, editor lists, no cvs/rcs/revision history.
no change log, no search tool, no includes
not nestable (for pseudo-framed usage)
I could go on but its 9:30pm and I have a mtg
over putting up another portal.
{-----}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
