On 14-Jan-00 09:51:52 joel.neely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> On 11-Jan-00 16:06:47 icimjs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I support the REBOL ONLY policy. I think it's important that the
>> > REBOL.org site act as proof-of-concept site. Why don't we
>> > implement a REBOL version of Ted's Kabob proposal and use that?
>> > So what if it takes a little longer until it comes online? Can we
>> > do that without XML?
>>
>> Gee, sounds like Bill Gates is rubbing off on some. :)
>>
> Well, Tim, can you think of a better demonstration of REBOL as a
> general-purpose, net-enabled language than bringing up an entire
> interactive site entirely in REBOL? !-}
> -jn-
And how much does it cost for the general user to do this?
There are many ways for me to respond but it still comes back to the
mindset or thought direction of closed system development. The web of a
spider.
---
*3 S.E.A.S - Virtual Interaction Configuration (VIC) - VISION OF VISIONS!*
*~ ~ ~ Advancing How we Perceive and Use the Tool of Computers!*
Timothy Rue What's *DONE* in all we do? *AI PK OI IP OP SF IQ ID KE*
Email @ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >INPUT->(Processing)->OUTPUT>v
Web @ http://www.mindspring.com/~timrue/ ^<--------<----9----<--------<
Search email/name @ http://www.dejanews.com for other puzzle parts/posts.
