[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 11-Jan-00 16:06:47 icimjs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I support the REBOL ONLY policy. I think it's important that the
> > REBOL.org site act as proof-of-concept site. Why don't we implement
> > a REBOL version of Ted's Kabob proposal and use that? So what if it
> > takes a little longer until it comes online? Can we do that without
> > XML?
>
> Gee, sounds like Bill Gates is rubbing off on some. :)
>
Well, Tim, can you think of a better demonstration of REBOL as a
general-purpose, net-enabled language than bringing up an entire
interactive site entirely in REBOL? !-}
-jn-
