Cheryl wrote:
>
>Jeff,
>
>You mention:
>> One other important ground rule is that everything has got
>> to be done with REBOL. No name-your-other-script
>> language allowed !!! (-:
>>
>> Of course, we at REBOL Tech. will lend as much direct
>> support as possible, and would certainly like to contribute
>> items to the cause when possible.
>>
>> So, does this approach still interest people? I would be
>> happy to immediately set up another selma list here for the
>> rebol.org group if three or more people are interested in
>> getting involved in this effort? (Dare I ask for people to
>> "me-to" on this on the mailing list??) ;-)
>>
>
>I was afraid of this REBOL only stipulation. Would this apply to bobr's
>project at sourceforge.net, too. I can't see how this is possible if XML is
>going to be used. REBOL does not support DTD/Schema validation at this
>stage.
>
I support the REBOL ONLY policy. I think it's important that the REBOL.org
site act as proof-of-concept site. Why don't we implement a REBOL version
of Ted's Kabob proposal and use that? So what if it takes a little longer
until it comes online? Can we do that without XML?
;- Elan >> [: - )]
