On 11-Jan-00 16:06:47 icimjs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cheryl wrote:
>>
>>Jeff,
>>
>>You mention:
>>> One other important ground rule is that everything has got
>>> to be done with REBOL. No name-your-other-script
>>> language allowed !!! (-:
>>>
>>> Of course, we at REBOL Tech. will lend as much direct
>>> support as possible, and would certainly like to contribute
>>> items to the cause when possible.
>>>
>>> So, does this approach still interest people? I would be
>>> happy to immediately set up another selma list here for the
>>> rebol.org group if three or more people are interested in
>>> getting involved in this effort? (Dare I ask for people to
>>> "me-to" on this on the mailing list??) ;-)
>>>
>>
>>I was afraid of this REBOL only stipulation. Would this apply to
>>bobr's project at sourceforge.net, too. I can't see how this is
>>possible if XML is going to be used. REBOL does not support
>>DTD/Schema validation at this stage.
>>
> I support the REBOL ONLY policy. I think it's important that the
> REBOL.org site act as proof-of-concept site. Why don't we implement
> a REBOL version of Ted's Kabob proposal and use that? So what if it
> takes a little longer until it comes online? Can we do that without
> XML?
> ;- Elan >> [: - )]
Gee, sounds like Bill Gates is rubbing off on some. :)
---
*3 S.E.A.S - Virtual Interaction Configuration (VIC) - VISION OF VISIONS!*
*~ ~ ~ Advancing How we Perceive and Use the Tool of Computers!*
Timothy Rue What's *DONE* in all we do? *AI PK OI IP OP SF IQ ID KE*
Email @ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >INPUT->(Processing)->OUTPUT>v
Web @ http://www.mindspring.com/~timrue/ ^<--------<----9----<--------<
Search email/name @ http://www.dejanews.com for other puzzle parts/posts.
