And one just to gather people that simply love Ubuntu. There is no rule that 
Ubuntu Global Jams must include work items.

Just sayin...



On July 31, 2014 8:25:03 PM PDT, "José Antonio Rey" <j...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>Then, it would probably be a good idea to analyze if it's worth having
>two global jams per cycle - one for packaging/design stuff, and other
>one for docs/translations.
>
>On 07/31/2014 10:22 PM, Michael Hall wrote:
>> 
>> On 07/31/2014 11:16 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:39 PM, José Antonio Rey <j...@ubuntu.com>
>wrote:
>>>> I would be for doing it on the week of the 4th September. That way,
>if
>>>> someone cannot finish something (as an example, in the
>documentation),
>>>> they will have more time to finish. I am saying this because most
>of the
>>>> contributions are to the docs, and the dates you are proposing are
>just
>>>> one week before doc freeze. Any other ideas?
>>>
>>> I think the proposed dates are alright, and September 5-7 would be
>ok
>>> too (Labor day in US is Sept 1, so no conflict there), but I'd
>really
>>> rather see these Jams planned further ahead in general (too late for
>>> this cycle). Daniel's proposed date is after both Feature and UI
>>> Freeze, making packaging jams and anything related to design not
>very
>>> useful if someone wants to contribute to this release - and having a
>>> package sit in a queue until the next release opens is really no
>fun.
>>> Doing it earlier in the cycle would still allow for great Testing
>and
>>> Bug jams, and squeeze packaging back in.
>>>
>> 
>> We went back and forth on this. Having the jam earlier allows bug
>fixes
>> and package updates, but it doesn't make sense for translations or
>even
>> a lot of docs (screenshots) if it's before UI Freeze. There are some
>> things that must be done earlier in the cycle, and some that must be
>> done later, so no single date would allow for everything.
>> 
>>> While the Docs team does appreciate having the Jam before freeze
>this
>>> time (thank you!), it does mean they only have a week to review the
>>> merge proposals before freeze, putting a bit of pressure on
>reviewing
>>> these in addition to any other last minute things that need to be
>>> (re)written.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Michael Hall
>> mhall...@ubuntu.com
>> 
>
>-- 
>José Antonio Rey
>
>-- 
>loco-contacts mailing list
>loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
>https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
-- 
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts

Reply via email to